Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter Saint-Andre's avatar

Here's something to wonder about: is pride really the crown of the virtues? In his book "Revaluing Ethics: Aristotle's Dialectical Pedagogy", Thomas W. Smith makes a pretty compelling case that Aristotle's discussion of megalopsuchia might be a dead end that leads Aristotle to make one of his famous fresh starts. Consider, for instance, that the great-souled man is described as "inert" (ἄργον), which is the very opposite of the deep activity (ἐνέργεια) that characterizes both arete and eudaimonia. Also, the word commonly rendered as "crown" (κόσμος) can also mean "adornment" or even "bauble". Indeed, i's not even clear to me that "pride" is the best rendering of μεγαλοψυχία. Reading Smith's treatment of the topic certainly set me to wondering...

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts